@TermDog

"BBC article says she did a similar job not same, written by the lady herself."

Which BBC article? I gave you two. Neither of them were "written by the lady herself". Neither of the articles talked about similar jobs, either- they talked about men and women doing the same jobs and the women being paid less than the men.

All up, I gave you links to four articles on the gender pay gap at three different corporations. Two of them were about the BBC,  the other two weren't. You've mentioned only one of the four articles - though your description of it rendered it unrecognisable. Is there a reason you've omitted to even mention the other three articles? Is it because the facts don't fit your fallacy? Or is it because the facts fit your ideology very nicely indeed, thank you very much,  and you're fine with women being paid less than men for the same job, because in your opinion women just aren't worth as much as men, but admitting that would make you look like...well...a bit of a cunt? "... we aren't all equal"- that's what you said, right?

Let's look at the four articles in depth, since it's obvious you either didn't read them or you didn't comprehend them or you're being dishonest about what you read. We'll start with the New York Times article on BBC senior international news editor Carrie Gracie's reason for resigning.

"A senior editor for BBC News accused the network in an open letter on Sunday of operating a secretive and illegal” salary system that pays men more than women in similar positions.

The editor, Carrie Gracie, who joined the network 30 years ago, said she quit her position as China editor last week to protest pay inequality within the company. In the letter posted on her website, she said that she and other women had long suspected that their male counterparts drew larger salaries and that BBC management had refused to acknowledge the problem...

Ms. Gracie said she learned in that report just how severely she had been underpaid despite her high-ranking position in its news division. While she did not reveal her salary, she said that of the four international news editors, the two men earned 50 percent more than the two women...”

Now let's look at the other three articles.

News.com.au article on Lisa Wilkinson's reason for resigning:

"TODAY host Lisa Wilkinson has made a shock announcement that she will quit the Nine Network program after 10 years and has taken a job with The Project...

Wilkinson’s sudden departure from the network follows reports she was unwilling to renew her contract with Nine until she was paid the same as co-host Karl Stefanovic, who is rumoured to be earning double her salary..."

Washington Post article on Catt Sadler's reason for resigning:

"As she [Catt Sadler] spent months shuttling from the daytime “Daily Pop” to “E! News” at night, an executive at the company informed her that her co-host [Jason Kennedy]— a man she had lovingly referred to as “my TV husband” — was making nearly double what she made, even though they started at the network in the same year and were doing basically the same job."

The Guardian article on gender wage gap between the talent at the BBC.

" Clare Balding, the sports presenter, received about a tenth of Gary Lineker’s pay, earning £150,999–£199,999 compared with his £1.75m–£1.79m. "

Gary Lineker is a sports presenter, as the article below confirms, so he and Balding did the same job, just as Sadler, Wilkinson and Gracie did the same jobs their male counterparts were paid much more for doing.
 https://www.irishnews.com/magazine/entertainment/2017/07/20/news/gary-li...

As I've already said twice before, I win the argument. Indisputably.