That is according to what is claimed in the Bible. I, of course, don't believe that. The Old Testament was written by Jewish priests, when the history of the ancient Israelites was mostly over, with the specific purpose of persuading other Jews that the reason terrible things kept happening to them, is that they didn't obey God's will closely enough. But they also argue that God created everything, including all of mankind. So the only logical answer they can peddle to their flock, is that God created all these people, who insisted on breaking his laws anyway, bringing down God's punishment upon them. Which means that they believe that either (a) God sabotaged his own creation, or (b) somehow this omniscient deity created all this stuff, having no clue whatsoever that men would be so sinful that he would have to keep killing them.

As far as the good and bad go It's like marriage you cant have one without the other. Both are subjective concepts.

Everything in existence is in a constant state of search for balance while dealing with the influences of inertia and existing in a vacuum. But yes, I was speaking metaphorically and suggesting the greatest force we have that attributes to the creation of life is nothing, if this were to be labeled God then it could be said God was nothing and therefor was the opposite of existence. Like a vacuum empty space the most powerful known force in the universe. In a vacuum objects are drawn towards each other when mass gets large enough atomic reactions occur a large enough atomic reaction could throw things way out of balance this would send things spiraling out until its inertia was gone and then balance or gravity would be all that was left as it all returned to a central point again where once enough mass gathered the cycle would begin again. Because of this process and the amount of things that are in existence before total balance can be achieved the whole cycle will begin again. Gravity is the great balance or equalizer but things under immense pressure and heat can react in ways that counter gravity. What I am saying above is, what if God was simply the inability for balance to be achieved? So therefor God does not exist unless you want to label something that does not exist to be God. It is this drive to obtain this unobtainable perfect balance that drives all of creations actions.

Another idea could be to call God all of creation. But that would make it seem all that much more vulnerable and less powerful than in my opinion to call him the opposite of existence! Above I was not attributing sentience to the universe but I think either way God would not be good or bad and really would not care one way or the other about the daily ramblings of the creatures of earth. I think if this nothing/everything were to exist in a conscious state it would be more of a collection of all possibilities being played out over and over again more like a record of all possibilities being played until it had all been done came full circle and then was done again at infinitude. I personally don't think God if there is one cares what we call it or assign our name for it to. I just think if you wanted to call God the most powerful and creative force you would call it nothing if you wanted to call God all of existence you would call it just that, everything and nothing combined. But either way this would mean you were call calling it all that it would be good along with all that is bad or evil as well.

Theist will argue but where did all this come from? What made it all exist? These are good questions in my opinion and nobody knows the answers. In an attempt to answer, theist have created and used God as an answer. One may ask, What is the meaning of life? When combined with the theist answer of God one may conclude to do God's bidding. When one does not accept that answer one may conclude to exist. My two questions to a theist would be in so far as God goes, what if God was everything meaning every last atom down to and including nothing and what if God were nothing if you did not consider yourself as a theist be to part of God? I think the universe is far bigger than we know, and I don't know where all existence came from but I tend to think that it has just always been rearranging reshaping into every possible reconfiguration. I just think it (is) nothing more and nothing less. Someday I may be proven wrong and find out there is something more to it but for now that's the best I have to go on.

All of this illustrates the dilemma I posed earlier. There is no way for a theist to properly define "God", because any definition will either be (a) s specific that facts and logic can easily rip it apart, or (b) so vague as to be meaningless -- defining "God" merely as the stuff that makes good things happen, that makes us feel good, that makes us want to do good things...