Is it unreasonable to believe in a Creator?
Donating = Loving
Bringing you atheist articles and building active godless communities takes hundreds of hours and resources each month. If you find any joy or stimulation at Atheist Republic, please consider becoming a Supporting Member with a recurring monthly donation of your choosing, between a cup of tea and a good dinner.
Log in or create an account to join the discussions on the Atheist Republic forums.
Zaphod has never accurately been quoted to say: "So apparently the rules of ping pong are "natural forces"...."
But as of this post can be accurately quoted as saying: I think the quality of this conversation is really bad must be the static or interference perhaps the physical device because my points sure not getting across and I can't seem to make sense of what Gerry is saying it seems to get worse and worse as the conversation progresses, or perhaps as Gerry says, perhaps it has more to do with Gerry than the devices used for the conversation.
Nyarlathotep: you are playing pretty fast and loose with the term "law" i see.
Gerry: Don't think so. From my dictionary: "Law: noun: A generalization that describes recurring facts or events".
Zaphod: Zaphod has never accurately been quoted to say: "So apparently the rules of ping pong are "natural forces"...."
Gerry: Did I copy and paste the wrong person on that post? Sorry about that. I'd fix it, but I don't see an "edit" button here.
Pages