I'm against violation of freedoms and harms to the human species. I am not an atheist so to speak but a Humanist. An atheist is a definition of someone who does not believe in God, as a theist is someone who believes in God. I do not define myself as an atheist but a Humanist, just as many theists do not call themselves theists but Christians or Jews, etc. I am directly opposed to any form of law based on religious values, I am directly opposed to war, to killing, to violence, to ignorance, to money and to power. I am against anything that tries to harm our species, for my species and my planet are all that I can call home.

I agree with what Zarathustra said. I'm against all the bad people who harms others whether they are theist or atheists. The most important here is we do not harm others as well as out planet and other species living on it. We can have different opinions but we must be able to respect others' opinion and view because love is more important than any belief that humans have.

To be 'against' God would be to first assume he exists. I have no qualms with an imaginary friend. I'm against the Bible, but as Damanar said, not because I'm an atheist - because I'm a Humanist and I recognize that many of it's so-called morals and messages are detrimental to humankind. Similarly, I'm against superstition and religion (essentially just organized superstition anyway) because they encourage a way of thinking, maybe more fittingly non-thinking, that stunts scientific progress by discouraging the application of a skeptical, scientific, questioning viewpoint, especially that of children.

i live and let live...but when religion creeps it's way into the life of others, influencing politics, the way research is being made or just creates a intolerance towards things and people that they just don't understand...i'm a militant...i don't hate religious people just like a i don't hate mental pacientes...but i would oppose any of those 2 categories telling me how to live my life...

I am against the bible. As Richard Dawkins put it "the god of the old testament is jealous and proud of it; a petty, unjust, unforgiving control-freak; a vindictive, bloodthirsty ethnic cleanser; a misogynistic, homophobic, racist, infanticidal, genocidal, filicidal, pestilential, megalomaniacal, sado- masochistic, capriciously malevolent bully." That about sums it up

What bothers me is how fake so many religious people can be. They push their opinion on you and judge you is yours if different. I don't see why everyone can't just have their own beliefs and be left alone for it.

As an atheist I am not really against any of these things but rather I do not believe in deities. I personally am however against the abuse of all these things you have listed here and see evidence of it everywhere. To me it is more about respect for other fellow humans and life than anything else. I am tolerant of the views of others as they deserve to have them as much as I can say I deserve to have the rights to my own views. I don not personally believe in any particular God or gods per say and I disagree with religions based on beliefs of such figures but I can see plenty of reason why someone would hold or have such views and I am respectful of people who choose to do so as long as these people are respectful of the views of others and do not try to unwelcome impose their own views onto others or force people who do not share their views to follow rules set up because of their own religious views. I can be just as opposed to the actions of another extreme atheist as I can be to the actions of an extreme christian for example. I also do not believe religion and government should ever be allowed to mix unfortunately a great deal of religious people disagree with me on that one!

As an atheist I am against the proliferation or ignorance and the ignoring of facts.

On a more personal level I am against a whole lot more inequality, corruption and abuse.

I am not against any of the all 4 options, everyone should be entitled to believe whatever they want unless they want to feed force it to other people or hurt other people for their lack/difference of beliefs; what i am really agianst is stupidity, selfishness and greediness.

I think that rather than define anything as anti anything else, we could have much more accurate and useful definitions by talking about what atheism supports. It makes much more sense to talk about what a thing is than spend forever naming all the things it is not.

As an agnostic I am for freedom of thought, individual actualization, rationality, and intrinsic moral intelligence.